![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
percivalfrom ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
sff_corgi via ashavah:
Harry or Ron: Harry. Alone, confused, has to get a grip.
Ron or Hermoine: Hermione. She's sorted.
Hermione or Cho: Cho. We've seen her only through Harry's uncomprehending eyes. I applaud her courage in trying to fight Voldemort, and can sympathise with her confusion. Besides, Hermione is a bit too all powerful in the book.
Cho or Ginny: Ginny. Naughty, naughty girl ...
Dumbledore or McGonagall: Dumbledore. He shows he can learn
Moody or Tonks: Moody. Constant vigilance!
Tonks or McGonagall: McGonagall. Tonks is a bit too 2D and clownish for my liking. Besides, "Cough drop, Dolores?"
Ravenclaw or Gryffindor: Ravenclaw. I'm all for the underrepresented.
Now, add a question of your own!
sff_corgi via ashavah:Harry or Ron: Harry. Alone, confused, has to get a grip.
Ron or Hermoine: Hermione. She's sorted.
Hermione or Cho: Cho. We've seen her only through Harry's uncomprehending eyes. I applaud her courage in trying to fight Voldemort, and can sympathise with her confusion. Besides, Hermione is a bit too all powerful in the book.
Cho or Ginny: Ginny. Naughty, naughty girl ...
Dumbledore or McGonagall: Dumbledore. He shows he can learn
Moody or Tonks: Moody. Constant vigilance!
Tonks or McGonagall: McGonagall. Tonks is a bit too 2D and clownish for my liking. Besides, "Cough drop, Dolores?"
Ravenclaw or Gryffindor: Ravenclaw. I'm all for the underrepresented.
Now, add a question of your own!
