IVF Poll

Apr. 1st, 2004 01:03 pm
percival: (Default)
[personal profile] percival
[Poll #271874]

Feel free to be honest! A good friend of mine defended the "no" vote to me recently, and I can see her point in that IVF is a "luxury" intervention - you are not curing a life threatening illness, you are just helping a couple indulge in their dream of a child.

Date: 2004-04-02 07:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] piperx.livejournal.com
I'm going to take the truly psychological approach to this question and wonder why you're asking this. Granted, it's a very interesting issue. I'm not even sure how I would answer it because there are a lot of gray areas and I'm not familiar with the types of things that the NHS covers.

I'm leaning towards "yes". Infertility *is* a medical problem and therefore should be covered along with other medical problems. Here in the states, most medical insurance policies will not cover "luxury" treatments such as non-medical related plastic surgery, yet you'd be hard pressed to find a health insurance policy that would *not* cover infertility treatments. It's perfectly reasonable IMO and in the opinion of the IHS.

But back to the original question, I hope this doesn't have any major bearing on your decision to consider IVF. If you have this option available to you and you really want to go this route, I definitely think you should take advantage of the NHS coverage and not feel guilty about it.

I'm sorry if I'm making an assumption that is totally off-base. Please tell me to piss off if I am. :-)

Profile

percival: (Default)
Percival

December 2010

S M T W T F S
   1234
56 7891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 31st, 2025 04:54 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios